Introduction
emarand is best understood through records rather than speculation. The clearest documented connection is Harben Emarand Limited, a UK private limited company incorporated in March 2016 and registered for management consultancy activities other than financial management. The company also appears in patent records connected with an engineered skip for domestic and industrial waste. Those two records provide the strongest foundation for understanding emarand without relying on promotional descriptions or assumptions.
The public record also shows that the company’s present position requires careful wording. Companies House currently lists Harben Emarand Limited as active with an active proposal to strike off, alongside overdue accounts and an overdue confirmation statement. That makes the current corporate position materially different from simply describing the business as an ordinary active consultancy.
Harben Emarand Limited was incorporated in 2016
Harben Emarand Limited was incorporated in the United Kingdom on 12 March 2016. Companies House gives the company number as 10059539 and records its registered office at 47 Grove Street, Retford, Nottinghamshire, England, DN22 6LA. The company is registered as a private limited company.
Its recorded nature of business is SIC code 70229, described as management consultancy activities other than financial management. This is one of the most important facts to establish when researching emarand because it comes directly from the official company register.
The registration does not establish every service the company may have offered. It simply records the company’s declared business classification. A careful article should therefore avoid turning that classification into a list of specific consulting services unless those services can be independently verified.
That distinction matters when researching a relatively obscure company. Search results can easily combine official records with descriptions written by third parties. The company register provides the firmest basis for factual statements about Harben Emarand Limited.
The company’s current Companies House position needs attention
The present Companies House record is more complicated than the incorporation history.
Harben Emarand Limited is currently shown as “Active — Active proposal to strike off.” Companies House also displays warnings for overdue accounts and an overdue confirmation statement. The record says the next accounts, made up to 31 May 2023, were due by 29 February 2024, while the next confirmation statement was due by 25 March 2024.
This should not be rewritten as proof that the company has stopped trading. The register does not make that conclusion for a writer. It does, however, establish that the company has an unresolved filing position and an active strike-off proposal.
For anyone researching emarand, this is an important distinction. “Active” is the official company status shown on the page, while “active proposal to strike off” is an additional status that signals a significant corporate process.
Older information about the company should therefore be dated rather than presented as a description of its current position.
The patent record gives emarand a distinctive technical connection
The most unusual part of the public record is the patent history.
Harben Emarand Limited is identified in patent records as the original and current assignee of an invention concerning a skip for domestic and industrial waste. The patent family has a priority date of 13 May 2014 and names John Paul Rae as the inventor.
The invention was not simply a conventional open waste container. The patent describes a body with an opening and multiple doors that can move between open and closed positions. In the closed position, the doors work together to close or seal the opening.
The design also describes a configuration intended to give a person access to the interior from ground level when the doors are open. The patent documentation explains that the arrangement was intended to address manual-handling issues associated with conventional skips.
That technical detail is the strongest reason to look beyond the company’s consultancy classification when researching emarand.
What the patented skip was designed to do
The patent describes a number of features rather than one simple change.
One central feature is the use of multiple doors. The described embodiment includes horizontally opening doors and vertically opening doors. When closed, the doors cooperate to close the opening in the skip.
The patent also describes a body mounted on a frame with wheels and a tow hitch. This allows the skip to be connected to a vehicle.
Another design feature concerns the shape of the skip walls. The patent describes non-linear wall sections intended to strengthen the structure. The stated purpose was to provide strength without relying on internal bracing that could obstruct access to the interior.
The patent also describes possible partitions within the skip. These could divide the interior into sections, including arrangements intended to support separation of waste materials. Other described embodiments include mesh sections, transparent sections, air-flow features, and waste-processing equipment.
These are patent-described features. They should not be presented as proof that every feature was manufactured, commercially deployed, or adopted by the waste industry.
That is an important line to maintain in factual writing about emarand.
The UK patent was granted in 2021
The UK patent record identifies GB2541347B as the granted version of the invention. The record shows the application being filed on 13 May 2015, publication of GB2541347A on 15 February 2017, and grant and publication of GB2541347B on 31 March 2021.
The patent database currently displays the UK record as “Expired – Fee Related.” Google Patents explicitly warns that its displayed legal-status information is an assumption and not a legal conclusion.
That warning is worth respecting.
It is accurate to say that the UK patent was granted and that the patent database currently displays an expired, fee-related status. It would be inappropriate to turn that database label into a stronger legal conclusion without checking the relevant official patent register.
For an article about emarand, precise wording is more valuable than an exaggerated claim about intellectual-property status.
The US patent followed a similar path
The same patent family also reached the United States.
US publication US20170088353A1 was published on 30 March 2017. The record identifies John Paul Rae as inventor and Harben Emarand Ltd as the original and current assignee listed in the database. The application later resulted in US10294024B2, which was granted on 21 May 2019.
The US patent record currently displays “Expired – Fee Related” as its status and, again, warns that the displayed legal status is not a legal conclusion.
This gives the emarand patent story an international dimension, but the wording still needs to remain factual. The record proves that the application proceeded through the US patent system and resulted in a granted patent. It does not prove commercial success or widespread use of the invention.
The Canadian application had a different outcome
The patent family did not produce the same result in every jurisdiction.
The Canadian application CA2985724A1 is recorded as abandoned. It was filed on 13 May 2015 and published on 19 November 2015. The record identifies Harben Emarand Ltd as the current and original assignee listed in the database and John Paul Rae as the inventor.
This is a useful detail because it demonstrates why writers should avoid saying that a patent was simply “granted worldwide.”
Patent applications are jurisdiction-specific. A patent family can contain applications that are granted in one country and abandoned or otherwise discontinued in another.
The emarand records provide a clear example of that distinction.
Richard Michael Merrills is the active director
Companies House currently lists Richard Michael Merrills as an active director of Harben Emarand Limited. He was appointed on the date of incorporation, 12 March 2016.
The company record also lists William George Hewitt as a former director. Hewitt was appointed on 12 March 2016 and resigned on 1 October 2019. Scott Valentine was appointed on 1 January 2020 and resigned on 24 October 2022.
This provides a documented leadership timeline.
The changes are worth mentioning because company records are often more reliable for historical leadership information than old business directories or copied profile pages. A person listed as a former director should not be described as a current director simply because an older page still contains their name.
Richard Michael Merrills is also recorded as the person with significant control
The Companies House persons-with-significant-control record lists Richard Michael Merrills as the active person with significant control. The record states that he holds 75% or more of the company’s shares and voting rights and has the right to appoint or remove directors.
That information provides a clearer picture of corporate control than the director list alone.
It is also another example of why primary records are valuable when writing about emarand. Rather than guessing who controls the company from job titles or online biographies, the official register provides a specific corporate disclosure.
The same record identifies Scott Valentine as a former person with significant control, with that status ending on 24 October 2022.
The company’s filing history shows earlier strike-off activity
The current proposal to strike off is not the first strike-off-related event appearing in the company’s history.
Companies House records show a first Gazette notice for compulsory strike-off dated 7 June 2017, followed by a discontinuation of the compulsory strike-off action on 10 June 2017. Another first Gazette notice appears on 5 June 2018, followed by discontinuation of that action on 28 July 2018. A further first Gazette notice for compulsory strike-off appears on 5 March 2019.
This history makes the company’s current filing position more significant.
It shows that strike-off procedures have appeared in the company’s public filing history before. At the same time, the record should not be used to speculate about why each previous process occurred unless the relevant filings establish the reason.
The useful point is simply that the corporate history contains multiple strike-off-related events.
The invention predates the company’s incorporation
One of the most interesting details in the record is the timeline.
Harben Emarand Limited was incorporated on 12 March 2016, while the patent family gives the invention a priority date of 13 May 2014.
That means the documented invention history predates the incorporation of Harben Emarand Limited by almost two years.
The patent record shows a UK priority application from 2014 and a later filing in 2015. It also identifies Harben Emarand Ltd in the later patent record as the assignee.
This chronology is important because it prevents a common mistake: assuming that every event associated with a company began on its incorporation date.
The available records show that the underlying invention has an earlier priority date.
What can safely be said about emarand
The strongest factual description of emarand is built from three pieces of evidence.
First, Harben Emarand Limited is a UK private limited company incorporated in 2016 and registered for management consultancy activities other than financial management.
Second, the company is connected in patent records with an invention for a skip designed for domestic and industrial waste, with multiple doors and other structural features described in the patent documents.
Third, the company’s current Companies House record shows an active proposal to strike off alongside overdue filings.
Those facts are enough to build a strong article.
There is no need to add unsupported claims about emarand being a revolutionary consultancy, a major industry leader, or a widely adopted waste-management technology. The public record does not establish those claims.
Why the patent story matters more than promotional language
The patent provides something concrete that promotional descriptions cannot: a documented technical invention with identifiable dates, an inventor, an assignee, applications in multiple jurisdictions, and granted patents in the UK and United States.
That makes the patent history the most distinctive part of the emarand story.
The invention itself addresses practical issues around access to a skip, door arrangements, structural strength, and waste handling. The patent even describes possible additions such as partitions, mesh, transparent sections, and waste-processing equipment.
None of that proves that every proposed configuration reached commercial production. It does show what the patent application sought to protect.
That distinction gives the subject much stronger credibility.
The most important lesson from the public record
Researching emarand requires discipline because the available information comes from different types of records.
Companies House establishes the company’s legal identity, incorporation date, business classification, officers, control information, and filing position. Patent records establish the invention history and the jurisdictions in which applications were filed or granted.
Those sources answer different questions.
A company registration does not prove that a patented product became commercially successful. A patent grant does not prove that a product was widely manufactured. A current “active” company status does not necessarily mean the company is operating normally, particularly when the same record shows a proposal to strike off and overdue filings.
The strongest writing therefore keeps each fact in its proper place.
For emarand, that approach produces a much clearer picture: a UK company incorporated in 2016, a documented management-consultancy classification, a patent connection involving an improved waste skip, changes in company leadership, and a present corporate record carrying unresolved filing issues.
Conclusion
The most credible story around emarand is also the simplest one to defend.
Harben Emarand Limited exists in the UK corporate record, was incorporated on 12 March 2016, and is registered under management consultancy activities other than financial management. Its name also appears in patent records connected with an improved skip for domestic and industrial waste, an invention with a priority date reaching back to 2014.
The company’s present record deserves equal attention. Companies House currently shows an active proposal to strike off and overdue filings, so current descriptions should not present the company as an unquestionably active consultancy without qualification.
The real value in researching emarand is the evidence. The company record and patent history provide enough material for a useful article without inventing a larger story around the name. When the facts are this specific, there is no reason to fill the gaps with speculation.
FAQs
1. When was Harben Emarand Limited incorporated?
Harben Emarand Limited was incorporated on 12 March 2016. Companies House records its company number as 10059539 and its registered office in Retford, Nottinghamshire.
2. What business activity is officially registered for Harben Emarand Limited?
The company is registered under SIC code 70229, management consultancy activities other than financial management.
3. What invention is associated with emarand?
Patent records associate Harben Emarand Limited with a skip for domestic and industrial waste. The described design uses multiple doors and includes features intended to provide ground-level access to the skip interior.
4. Was the emarand waste-skip patent granted?
The patent family includes UK patent GB2541347B, granted and published on 31 March 2021, and US patent US10294024B2, granted on 21 May 2019. Patent databases currently display fee-related expiry statuses for these records, and their databases warn that displayed legal-status information is not a legal conclusion.
5. What is the current status of Harben Emarand Limited?
Companies House currently lists the company as “Active — Active proposal to strike off” and shows warnings for overdue accounts and an overdue confirmation statement.
